FeaturesGrowthPostsStreaming WarsSVODSo Who Does Win the OTT Streaming Wars?

Kauser KanjiFebruary 21, 20202 min

Earlier this month I suggested that the Streaming Wars should more accurately be described as the Streaming Skirmishes because although this wasn’t a winner-takes-all scenario, and that multiple SVOD services could happily coexist, even if (hypothetically) one champion emerged they’d still then need to tackle the wider threats for attention and eyeballs from editorial, gaming, social, real-life experiences and eventually, AR / VR. 

It’s still fun to play the game, however, and try to address the question for our industry alone: if there could only be one victor, who does win the Streaming Wars?

The obvious answer is the company that is best at turning prospects into enduring – rather than ephemeral, seasonal or tactical – customers. 

To understand the acquisition strategies of the various contenders, we can create a pyramid of customer types that looks something like this:

Every VOD service can, to a greater or lesser degree, benefit from impulse buyers, free triallists, word of mouth customers and people who have already registered for updates or limited access. But the really big guys come with existing constituencies that can also be converted into loyal, longer-term clients.

Sky and HBO, for example, can draw on their satellite / cable customers. Amazon has 200m worldwide retail customers. Google and Apple – and their related operating systems, app stores and OTT services – are embedded into billions of laptops, smartphones, tablets, TV devices and voice assistants.

My guess, however, is that the winner of the Streaming Wars is… 


Why? Because Apple has hardware, but Disney has merchandise; Google has YouTube, Disney has Hulu; Amazon has direct billing relationships with millions of people, Disney too has billing relationships with the millions of people that visit its theme parks.

And on top of that, Disney has almost 100 years’ worth of content (including, of course, the Marvel and Star Wars catalogues) that captivates viewers whatever their age.

The real clincher for me though is that Disney has an ever-replenishing customer base: children. Kids become teenagers, become adults, become parents. And at every stage, whether they know it or not, they’re engaging with Disney content, products and experiences. They have loyalty baked in. Confirming that by subscribing to Disney+ is, therefore, only natural.

What do you think? Good theory / bad theory? Drop me a line with your thoughts or add a comment if you’re seeing this on LinkedIn. 

Kauser Kanji

I've been working in online video since 2005 and have held senior roles at NBC Universal, Trinity Mirror and Virgin Media. I've also worked on VOD projects for the BBC, Netflix, Sony Pictures, DR in Denmark and a host of broadcasters and service-providers all over the world.

Reporting from the Future of Television

VOD Professional contains news, reviews, interviews and analyses from the future of TV. Online video is at a pivotal moment in its evolution and our focus is on writing about monetisation, product development and the people – from service-providers and vendors alike – who help bring brilliant content and services to our screens.

Get our Weekly Industry News Digest


We have 15 years of experience in working on strategic consulting projects for Netflix, Sony Pictures, Virgin Media and a host of commercial and public service broadcasters in Europe, North America, APAC and MENA. Drop us a line if you need some help, want to join our next event or just want to have a geek-out about the industry!

VOD Professional, 2020 © All Rights Reserved